New facts regarding Smolensk. A BND report reveals backstage activity of Yuri Desinov. Was secret FSB unit in Poltava behind the assassination?
Published: November 1, 2016
In his book Smolensk 2010. A Plot that changed the world, regarding a report from the Smolensk crash by German intelligence service BND, German journalist Jürgen Roth indicates potential commissioners and executors of the... assassination. Attention is paid in particular to General Yuri Desinov, who commanded an FSB (Russian security service) unit in Poltava.
“According to the description by Robert (surname obscured) the order to assassinate the Tu-154 was sent directly by (title obscured) T. (surname of a high-rank Polish politician obscured) to Desinov,” claims the source report by a BND officer.
Desinov’s actions are described in detail in two annexes to the BND report. Their content indicates the Russian spy’s dynamic activity, and a very detailed planning of secret operations. The FSB unit in Poltava attracted attention after its actions against Alexandr Popov (Kaliningrad), and Alexandr Dudarev (Riga / Hamburg). In Annex 1, Desinov is described to have acted undercover in Ukraine, associating himself with Order of Saint Lazarus.
Desinov’s range of connections is revealed in Annex 2.
“Desinov claims he can contact Mullah Omar in Afghanistan. Allegedly, Omar would be happy to significantly reduce the number of attacks on German Bundeswehr by the Taliban, provided his conditions, unknown at present, were met. Desinov is ready to negotiate a deal for him in Berlin with appropriate decision-makers. He is driven by financial motives. (...) Desinov received a visa. His entry was disguised as a visit at the Order of Saint Lazarus. Means that make such actions possible are also at his disposal,” reads a secret document, revealed by Jürgen Roth.
The author of the BND report claims that Desinov could have had an easy access to explosives and operational technologies. However, he emphasized that to place an explosive, or the TNT with remote detonators in the government plane with the Polish president on board, he would have needed help from... the Polish. Information revealed by Jürgen Roth is not only striking, but also a breakthrough, as it implicates a heavy involvement of the Russian intelligence.
Click on the thumbnails below to view screen dumps from the detectors used to examine the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample"
Why did they all fly on the same plane?
Synopsis: January 12, 2013, Toronto, Canada. The wife of the late Deputy-Minister of Culture Tomasz Merta: "What I am about to tell you now, are suspicions - and not even my own - but, rather the [suspicions of the] individuals in the inner-circles of the [Polish] military... I heard a statement that was made - but, I am not taking any responsibility for how credible, or not credible it is. [I heard that] had the generals and journalists' not been re-assigned to different aircraft, it wouldn't have been the Tupolev [Tu-154M], but rather the Casa [transport aircraft] that would have been taken out.
Because the Generals were no longer onboard the Casa, there was no reason for it to get airborne. And for this reason it was the Yak[-40] that flew off to Smolensk. This Casa [transport aircraft] was never examined in any way. It was not subject to any examination. Aside from a single note in the deposition given to the military, no one was interested why this aircraft didn't fly [to Smolensk]. Perhaps, this is someones crazy phantasy, but perhaps it isn't.
Some [Polish] military personnel had suggested, that it [the Casa] had to stay behind at the Okecie military [tarmack], so that the explosives could be removed from it - because they were no longer needed [...] I am only repeating what I was told."
"Disarming" Explosives ...
It is worth for us to retrace the entire process of "disarming" the case of explosive substances at the crash site. It all started with the publication of Cezary Gmyz in "Rzeczpospolita" on October 30, 2012, and information that the detectors, which were used by experts in Smolensk (in late September and October) showed traces of TNT and nitroglycerine.
As it turned out, the journalist was also reporting about the indication of Hexogen. The storm broke. The prosecution denied the publication, and ultimately, the editor-in-chief of "Rzeczpospolita," Cezary Gmyz and two other journalists lost their jobs. The entire editorial staff of one of Poland’s most popular weeklies, "Uważam Rze", was also silenced.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.