Smolensk Crash News Digest
  Flag of the United States of America
"The dismantling of the Polish State has just ended. Now people will start to disappear." Dr. Janusz Kurtyka Contact | About

Independent News, Research, Scientific Analysis, and Commentary on the Smolensk Crash and its Implications.

  • Antoni Macierewicz, Vice Chairman of the Law and Justice Party (PiS)Chairman of the Polish Government Re-Investigation Commission of the Crash of Polish Air Force One on April 10, 2010 in Smolensk
  • Russian Image Management by Euguene PoteatRetired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligence Officer Euguene Poteat speaks out
  • Smolensk Crash DisinformationNo one saw anything, no one heard anything, no one filmed anything ...
  • TNT and other explosives detected on the wreckage of Polish presidential planeC4, TNT, RDX, HMX (octogen), p-MNT and Nitroglycerine detected ...
  • Smolensk Crash related deaths"The Serial Suicider" Strikes Again. Key witness dead!
  • Countdown to the crash of Flight PLF101Countdown to the crash of Polish Governement Tupolev TU-154M flight PLF101.
  • Smolensk Widow Beata Gosiewska exposes the Smolnesk Crash LieSmolensk Crash Widow exposes the "Smolensk Lie"
  • The List of 96 Victims of Polish Air Crash In Smolensk, Russia, on April 10, 2010.The list of 96 victims
  • 9 Questions for Professor Binienda.Is the U.S. scientific community interested in the Smolensk crash?
  • Lech Kaczynski's Security Was Purposefully CompromisedPolish president's security was purposefully compromised!
  • Slide 11 Title Goes HereThe main causes of the Polish Tu-154M crash were two explosions onboard.
  • Facts presented in this report demonstrate a clear and convincing evidence of obstruction of justice in the one-sided and superficial investigation that violates basic norms of any airplane crash investigation, elementary standards of due process of law, and rights of the families of the victims.Was the official investigation an obstruction of justice?
Chairman of the Polish Government Re-Investigation Commission of the Crash of Polish Air Force One on April 10, 2010 in Smolensk Russian Image Management by Retired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligene Officer, Eugene Poteat, LL.D Smolensk Crash Disinformation Explosives Found on the wreckage of Polish Air Force One. Coverup by Suicide Smolensk Crash Timeline Smolensk Crash Lie Exposed. Smolensk Crash Victims 9 Questions for Dr. Binienda. Polish president's security was intentionally compromised. Scientific analysis of Smolensk crash points to the invalidity of the official findings. 2014 independent Smolensk Crash Raport: What do we know about Smolensk crash today.

Explosive bursting of an aircraft fuselage
Analytical Service Pty Ltd


A short segment of the fuselage of Tu-154M was modeled as shown in Fig.1. Note that it is inverted, consistent with the description of the incident. (Smolensk, 2010.) The chairs with passengers are modeled crudely, by means of sets of blocks.

An 8 kg charge of TNT was placed near the floor, on the passenger side and detonated. The shell of the fuselage was pushed by the impulse of the explosion, it broke and opened up broadly. The frames below show how the event developed. Notice the early holes in the floor due to the close proximity of the explosive charge.

The diameter of the shell is 3.8m and the skin thickness is 1.5 mm. When bursting, the edge of the shell attained the speed of about 80 m/s.


Because of double symmetry, only one-quarter of the fuselage segment had to be modeled.

The shell was made from an aluminum alloy with the properties between those between 2024-T3 and 2024-T351. Although strength-wise these alloys are not regarded as particularly sensitive to the speed of deformation, the tests indicate that there is a large increase in the failure strain while under rapid loading. This was not accounted here in order to have a clearer relationship between the amount of explosive and the extent of breakage.

The effects of such explosions are dependent on the amount of explosive used. A smaller charge, say 6 kg, would also, open the shell, but not to this extent.

When this is compared with an earlier simulation conducted by Sandia Labs, the main difference is whether the skin separates from the frames or not. We have assumed strong rivets, therefore no separation was observed.

The deformation of fuselage walls as found on the ground was quite similar to what was determined here, except for the additional distortion due to impacting against the ground. There was one important difference, though. In the cross-section of the fuselage normal to its axis there are two skin joints, at about 300 off the ceiling center, on each side of that center. Such discontinuities are prone to failure, especially under dynamic loading. Yet, symmetry in shape does not usually mean a symmetry of breakage, so one of the joints failed and the other remained attached to the rest of skin.

In our model the failure was induced in the plane of symmetry. This was done to keep the model size small by being able to create only one-half of the fuselage. We have therefore sacrificed some of the realism for the sake of making modeling job easier.

The effect of the fuselage being inverted or not is marginal and it relates only to how the internal contents were dispersed during the event.

Time = 0

Over-all view of the model of Polish government Tupolev TU-154M

Fig. 1 Above: Over-all view of the model

FUSELAGE SEGMENT, initial breaking
Time = 8.0984

Polish government plane crash: FUSELAGE SEGMENT, initial breaking

Fig. 2 Above: Early stage of opening up.

FUSELAGE SEGMENT, advanced breaking
Time = 33.498

Polish plane crash: FUSELAGE SEGMENT, advanced breaking.

Fig. 3 Above: Avanced stages of breaking

FUSELAGE SEGMENT, initial breaking
Time = 8.0984

Polish plane crash investigation: Early stage of opening up of fuselage

Fig. 4 Above: Early stage of opening up.

FUSELAGE SEGMENT, near-final opening
Time = 90.003

Polish plane crash investigation: FUSELAGE SEGMENT, near-final opening.

Fig. 4 Above: Breakage at the end of simulation.


"Russian Image Management"

The trip to Smolensk was expected to highlight Russia finally admitting culpability in the massacre, after long having blamed it on the Germans, an atrocity they had tried to conceal for over 70 years.

Eugene Poteat, retired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligence Officer.

As for the reception committee, it had different ideas. Putin wasn’t looking forward to such an occasion. Into this poisonous reception brew was President Kaczynski’s well-known public criticism of Moscow and Putin, a habit that has ended the lives of others within Russia – and abroad. A few discouraging Russian requirements – that Kaczynski could not attend in any official capacity – did not halt the Poles. Kaczynski would go anyway on non-official, “personal” business. To Russians, such a distinction would be meaningless, not lessening the possible international excoriation of such an event. A problem ripe for a modern, Russian solution: a tragic, ‘natural’ accident.

Read more here

The translation of all materials included on this website into English language, unless otherwise noted, is Copyright ©2008 - 2022 by DoomedSoldiers.com. All Rights Reserved. All materials on this website are subject to the United States and International Copyright Laws and are the property of their respective owners, appearing herewith under The Greater Public Good Doctrine.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.

Word Press WP3.8.1a b1.9