Header
Smolensk Crash News Digest
Independent News, Research, Scientific Analysis, and Commentary on the Smolensk Crash and its Implications. Flag of the United States of America
"The dismantling of the Polish State has just ended. Now people will start to disappear." Dr. Janusz Kurtyka Contact | About
  • Smolensk Crash DisinformationNo one saw anything, no one heard anything, no one filmed anything ...
  • Russian Image Management by Euguene PoteatRetired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligence Officer Euguene Poteat speaks out
  • TNT and other explosives detected on the wreckage of Polish presidential planeC4, TNT, RDX, HMX (octogen), p-MNT and Nitroglycerine detected ...
  • Smolensk Crash related deaths"The Serial Suicider" Strikes Again. Key witness dead!
  • Countdown to the crash of Flight PLF101Countdown to the crash of Polish Governement Tupolev TU-154M flight PLF101.
  • Smolensk Widow Beata Gosiewska exposes the Smolnesk Crash LieSmolensk Crash Widow exposes the "Smolensk Lie"
  • The List of 96 Victims of Polish Air Crash In Smolensk, Russia, on April 10, 2010.The list of 96 victims
  • 9 Questions for Professor Binienda.Is the U.S. scientific community interested in the Smolensk crash?
  • The destruction of the plane was initiated while it was still airborne, approaching landing.The destruction of the plane was initiated while it was still airborne, approaching landing.
  • Lech Kaczynski's Security Was Purposefully CompromisedPolish president's security was purposefully compromised!
  • Slide 11 Title Goes HereThe main causes of the Polish Tu-154M crash were two explosions onboard.
  • Facts presented in this report demonstrate a clear and convincing evidence of obstruction of justice in the one-sided and superficial investigation that violates basic norms of any airplane crash investigation, elementary standards of due process of law, and rights of the families of the victims.Was the official investigation an obstruction of justice?
Polish air crash disinformation. Russian Image Management by Retired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligene Officer, Eugene Poteat, LL.D Traces of explosives detected on remains of Polish president's plane. Serial Suicider on the loose. The crash of Flight PLF101 Timeline. Polish air crash lie exposed. Victims of Polish air crash. 9 Questions for the lead scientist in the independent Smolensk crash investigation. Mechanical and structural aspects of 2010 crash of Polish Government Tupolev TU-154M in Smolensk, Russka. Polish president's security was intentionally compromised. Scientific analysis of Smolensk crash points to the invalidity of the official findings. 2014 independent Smolensk Crash Raport: What do we know about Smolensk crash today.

Danish Engineer Glenn Jorgensen Analysis

What Happened to Polish President's Plane in Smolensk?

The [official Russian] MAK Report is not consistent with the laws of physics.

A birch tree could not cause damage during landing approach of the Polish President's plane in Russia four years ago, believes a Danish civil engineer.

A Danish civil engineer’s calculations have attracted a lot of attention in connection with a national trauma in Poland. 10 April 2010 - a Polish governmental plane crashed during a landing approach in Smolensk, Russia. All 96 persons on board, including President Lech Kaczynski, were killed. Spurred by the desire to find the correct explanation, Danish Glenn Jorgensen repeatedly participated in conferences on the plane crash in Poland, has communicated with Poland’s leading expert in aircraft accidents, and in late January 2014, took part in a hearing before the Polish Parliament. The reason his analysis arouse much commotion is because it supports conjecture that the accident was not an accident but an assassination. Glenn Jorgensen says to “Ingeniøren” that his analysis does not show the cause of the crash, only shows that it could not have occurred as indicated by AAIB.

Danish engineer Glenn Jorgensen: "I found out that the (official Russian) MAK Report is not consistent with the laws of physics."
Glenn Jorgensen (center) interview with TV Republika, Poland
He does not refuse, however, speculation of assassination and conspiracy. "If I would have been charged with designing such an attack on a plane with the message that it should look like an accidental as much as possible, I would have done it with explosions at low altitude," he said. The accident was investigated by a Russian AAIB, which in January 2011 concluded that the aircraft during the approach had hit a birch tree at a height of 5 meters, and as a result lost 5.5 meters of the left wing.

By the AAIB findings, the asymmetric lift to which the plane was subsequently subjected caused it to make a left roll. During five seconds the plane was turned over in the air. The tip of the left wing hit the ground first, and then the nose hit the ground with the result that all on board were exposed to a force of over 100 g, hence died immediately. An official Polish report of July 2011 placed some of the responsibility on the Russian aircraft controllers, but accepted the explanation of the birch tree. Many Poles believe, however, that the Russian involvement in the accident was much more active than that. This view is shared by Wiesław Binienda from the University of Akron in Ohio, USA, who is also editor- in-chief of the Journal of Aerospace Engineering. His calculations show that if the plane would have hit the birch tree the wing would have cut the tree as a knife. There would be only a minor damage to the wing edge. His analysis also shows that, if broken, the wing tip falling from a height of 5 meters, would hit the ground 12 meters after. In fact, the wing tip was found 111 meters from the birch tree.

Glenn Jorgensen says to “Ingeniøren” that his Smolensk crash analysis does not show the cause of the crash, only shows that it could not have occurred as indicated in official Polish & Russian governments' reports.
Glenn Jorgensen's analysi in Ingeniøren. Click to download

Binienda concludes the wing tip was most likely separated at a height of 26 meters, 69 meters after the birch tree. Other technical experts have shown interest in the accident, but virtually no non-Poles, with Glenn Jorgensen as an exception. He thoroughly worked through the data and results of the AAIB reports and made in-depth analysis with familiar formulas within the field of aerodynamics. He has also purchased satellite photos showing the ground traces from the accident. An estimated 500 hours of work later, he agrees with Binienda in concluding that the birch explanation is wrong. Glenn Jorgensen stresses that the black box recordings show that during the landing approach the plane was subjected to two rapid and significant lift losses, one such event right after the other. This indicates that about 5.5 meters of the wing broke first at an altitude of approx. 30 meters above the ground, and later an additional 3-5 m of the left wing was lost. "Only those assumptions about additional loss of the wing area are consistent with data from the plane's black boxes and the ground traces, "he said.

Glenn Jorgensen's strong interest in an accident in a country that he is not personally involved in is puzzling. "My wife has asked me about this many times. If you see an accident on the highway, where people are already on spot to help, you surely can continue. But when you see that the so-called helpers only make things worse by their behavior, so you must step up to do the right thing," he said. Poland's leading expert in aircraft accidents, Grzegorz Kowaleczko from the Polish Air Force Institute of Technology, ITWL, does not officially agree with Glenn Jorgensen. In December 2013 he published a report rejecting Glenn Jorgensen's analysis. ”Kowaleczko’s calculations show however that the plane would be more than 11 m above the mentioned birch tree, assuming it hits the ground, where it actually crashed. Officially, he picks on me, but the questions he has asked about my study tells me, that I am most likely on track," says Glenn Jorgensen. The newspaper “Ingeniøren” tried unsuccessfully to contact Grzegorz Kowaleczko by email for his comment before the article was published. Later Kowaleczko answered that he believes Glenn Jorgensen’s aerodynamic model is correct, also through his help. Glenn Jorgensen hopes that it would be possible to arrange a new conference about the accident - hopefully in Denmark, where all the experts can meet. But one thing is certain the Katyn massacre has never been forgotten in Poland. The same can be said of the Smolensk plane crash.

In 1940 Soviet troops in Katyn Forest 22 km from Smolensk committed a mass murder of Polish prisoners of war. The Soviet Union until 1990 kept denying that such a thing had occurred.

In April 2010, plans were made to hold a memorial in the Katyn forest in commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the massacre that began on April 4. The Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk flew to Smolensk on April 7 in order to participate in the event together with Russian President Vladimir Putin. President of Poland, Lech Kaczynski, planned to participate in a separate event a few days later.

NEW CALCULATIONS CHALLENGE THE OFFICIAL EXPLANATION OF THE POLISH AIR CRASH IN RUSSIA in 2010

NEW CALCULATIONS CHALLENGE THE OFFICIAL EXPLANATION OF THE POLISH AIR CRASH IN RUSSIA in 2010.

THE RUSSIAN AUTHORITIES’ EXPLANATION

The Russian authorities explained that, the crash was due to the pilot pulling up the airplane too late. As a result the plane hit a birch tree that tore a piece of of the wing. This made the plane to roll to the left and crash near the runway of the Smolensk airport.

1. In dense local fog with a visibility of 400 m the plane hit a birch tree at 5 meters height, very close to the ground.
2. The plane rolls violently to the left and flies at an angle of 90 degrees along the ground. 70 m before the crash all electricity power shuts down in the plane.
No explanation for it is given.
3. The plane crashes to the ground with the bottom side up, and all 96 people on-board die.

Distance between the birch and crash area: 340 meters

Text in the circle in the figure above: A piece of the left wing tip of 5.5 meters gets torn off.

The Russian authorities explained that, the crash was due to the pilot pulling up the airplane too late.

GLENN JØRGENSEN'S THEORY

The aerodynamic calculations by Danish engineer Glenn Jorgensen show that the aircraft needed be been at least 30 meters in height above the ground over the mentioned birch tree when it lost the first part of the left wing tip, in order to reach the crash area 340 meters ahead. Thus, the aircraft could not have had contact with the birch tree and the destruction of the wing was most likely caused by explosions.

Text under ‘roll angle plot’ Figure:
The figure shows the calculated roll angle of the plane following the loss of wing area for the two cases (A loss of 5.5 m respectively 9.5 m wing). A good correlation between the calculated roll angle and the the recorded roll angle data from the aircraft’s black box, is only present when assuming a wing loss of about 8.5 m to 10.5 m.

1. The plane loses the left wing tip at 30 meters height
2. Additional 3-5 meter of the left wing is lost
3. The plane makes a left roll of 130 degrees and rushes to the ground in an angle of 15 degrees.

In figure above first circle from right: The first piece of the wing tip 5.5 meters is lost. Second circle from the right: Additional piece of the wing is lost.

The aerodynamic calculations by Danish engineer Glenn Jorgensen show that the aircraft needed be been at least 30 meters in height above the ground over the mentioned birch tree when it lost the first part of the left wing tip, in order to reach the crash area 340 meters ahead.

Text from right hand side:
-Birch tree
-Wreckage of the left wing tip was found 111 m from the birch tree. If the official version claiming that the left wing was torn off as a result of hitting the birch tree was true, the wing tip should be found 12 meters from the tree, said Glenn Jorgensen.
-Findings of the inner parts from the left wing. -Satellite photo of the crash area
-On 10 April 2010, the President plane started from Warsaw heading for Smolensk in Russia

What caused the April 10, 2010 crash of Polish Air Force Tuplev Tu-154M in Smolensk, Russia?


See Glenn Jorgensen's Presentations Below:

 
Why did they all fly on the same plane?
Why was the Polish government delegation flying to Smolensk onboard a single aircraft?

Synopsis: January 12, 2013, Toronto, Canada. The wife of the late Deputy-Minister of Culture Tomasz Merta: "What I am about to tell you now, are suspicions - and not even my own - but, rather the [suspicions of the] individuals in the inner-circles of the [Polish] military... I heard a statement that was made - but, I am not taking any responsibility for how credible, or not credible it is. [I heard that] had the generals and journalists' not been re-assigned to different aircraft, it wouldn't have been the Tupolev [Tu-154M], but rather the Casa [transport aircraft] that would have been taken out.

Because the Generals were no longer onboard the Casa, there was no reason for it to get airborne. And for this reason it was the Yak[-40] that flew off to Smolensk. This Casa [transport aircraft] was never examined in any way. It was not subject to any examination. Aside from a single note in the deposition given to the military, no one was interested why this aircraft didn't fly [to Smolensk]. Perhaps, this is someones crazy phantasy, but perhaps it isn't.

Some [Polish] military personnel had suggested, that it [the Casa] had to stay behind at the Okecie military [tarmack], so that the explosives could be removed from it - because they were no longer needed [...] I am only repeating what I was told."

Read Magdalena Merta's Interview here

"Smolensk Widows"
Smolensk Widows: “The Smolensk Widows” is a story about these few brave and uncompromising women whose conscience, the sense of decency, and honor, didn’t allow to remain silent. Despite their profound loss, they bravely stood-up to defend the memory and truth about their husbands and friends, who perished on April 10, 2010 …

"The Smolensk Widows" - Excerpts ...

A new book entitled "The Smolensk Widows" by Dariusz Walusiak, was published under the auspices of the "Niepoprawni.pl" and the Publishing House “Rafael” in Poland. Following are some excerpts from this heart-wrenching book.

"The world had crumbled for many Poles on April 10, 2010, and in particular, for the families of the victims who were left to the official, and often contradictory reports about this tragedy. Few of those who lost their loved ones began their quest for truth [...] While demanding the truth, the “Smolensk Widows”, Ewa Błasik, Beata Gosiewska, Ewa Kochanowska, Zuzanna Kurtyka and Magdalena Merta, became the conscience of a mourning nation. “The Smolensk Widows” is a story about these few brave and uncompromising women whose conscience, the sense of decency, and honor, didn’t allow to remain silent. Despite their profound loss, they bravely stood-up to defend the memory and truth about their husbands and friends, who perished on April 10, 2010 …

Ewa Błasik, the wife of the late Polish Air Force Commander General Andrzej Błasik.

Above: Ewa Błasik, the wife of the late Polish Air Force Commander General Andrzej Błasik.

Q: Did General Błasik have good relationship with the upper-ranking officers who were flying with him to Katyn [on April 10, 2010]?

They all knew each other very well, and respected each other. They understood each other without words. When they had to fly somewhere, they called each other and made arrangements. The Chief of Staff, General Franciszek Gągor was an incredible man, a true Polish officer. More here

 

 

The translation of all materials included on this website into English language, unless otherwise noted, is Copyright ©2008 - 2016 by DoomedSoldiers.com. All Rights Reserved. All materials on this website are subject to the United States and International Copyright Laws and are the property of their respective owners, appearing herewith under The Greater Public Good Doctrine.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.

Word Press WP3.8.1a b1.1