Header
Smolensk Crash News Digest
Independent News, Research, Scientific Analysis, and Commentary on the Smolensk Crash and its Implications. Flag of the United States of America
"The dismantling of the Polish State has just ended. Now people will start to disappear." Dr. Janusz Kurtyka Contact | About
  • Smolensk Crash DisinformationNo one saw anything, no one heard anything, no one filmed anything ...
  • Russian Image Management by Euguene PoteatRetired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligence Officer Euguene Poteat speaks out
  • TNT and other explosives detected on the wreckage of Polish presidential planeC4, TNT, RDX, HMX (octogen), p-MNT and Nitroglycerine detected ...
  • Smolensk Crash related deaths"The Serial Suicider" Strikes Again. Key witness dead!
  • Countdown to the crash of Flight PLF101Countdown to the crash of Polish Governement Tupolev TU-154M flight PLF101.
  • Smolensk Widow Beata Gosiewska exposes the Smolnesk Crash LieSmolensk Crash Widow exposes the "Smolensk Lie"
  • The List of 96 Victims of Polish Air Crash In Smolensk, Russia, on April 10, 2010.The list of 96 victims
  • 9 Questions for Professor Binienda.Is the U.S. scientific community interested in the Smolensk crash?
  • The destruction of the plane was initiated while it was still airborne, approaching landing.The destruction of the plane was initiated while it was still airborne, approaching landing.
  • Lech Kaczynski's Security Was Purposefully CompromisedPolish president's security was purposefully compromised!
  • Slide 11 Title Goes HereThe main causes of the Polish Tu-154M crash were two explosions onboard.
  • Facts presented in this report demonstrate a clear and convincing evidence of obstruction of justice in the one-sided and superficial investigation that violates basic norms of any airplane crash investigation, elementary standards of due process of law, and rights of the families of the victims.Was the official investigation an obstruction of justice?
Polish air crash disinformation. Russian Image Management by Retired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligene Officer, Eugene Poteat, LL.D Traces of explosives detected on remains of Polish president's plane. Serial Suicider on the loose. The crash of Flight PLF101 Timeline. Polish air crash lie exposed. Victims of Polish air crash. 9 Questions for the lead scientist in the independent Smolensk crash investigation. Mechanical and structural aspects of 2010 crash of Polish Government Tupolev TU-154M in Smolensk, Russka. Polish president's security was intentionally compromised. Scientific analysis of Smolensk crash points to the invalidity of the official findings. 2014 independent Smolensk Crash Raport: What do we know about Smolensk crash today.

Breakthrough communiqué of the Smolensk Subcommittee!

Breakthrough communiqué of the Smolensk Subcommittee!

Published: January 10, 2018

The left wing of the Tu-154 M aircraft was destroyed as a result of internal explosion. There were several sources of explosion, and the birch tree had nothing to do with the original destruction of the wing. The spokeswoman of the Smolensk Subcommittee for Re-examination of the Air Disaster of Tu 154M (“Sub-Committee”) Marta Palonek issued an important communiqué on behalf of the Subcommittee.

As reported on this day at the plenary assembly of the Subcommittee, Frank Taylor, an international expert in the field of aviation accident investigation, after hearing the evidence of the Subcommittee, stated that:

1. the left wing of the Tu-154 M aircraft was destroyed by an internal explosion;

2. there were several sources of explosion: in the wing, slot, and also in the center wing, confirmed by the analysis of the mechanism of the door's impact on the ground, and

3. the birch tree did not cause the original destruction of the wing.

"I have no doubt whatsoever that there was an explosion. The vast majority of the damage can only be explained by an explosion. These were classic signs of an explosion. It would be very, very surprising if any professional investigator came to any other conclusion." - says Frank Taylor.

These conclusions are consistent with the findings of the members of the Sub-Committee and will constitute one of the key pillars of the technical report.

For the first time, such a firm statement that a sabotage took place in Smolensk was formulated by a recognized foreign expert in the study of aviation crashes. What's more, Frank Taylor – one of the foremost experts on aviation crashes - formulated his conclusions after carefully studying the evidence. This statement ultimately undermines the narrative of Lasek, Miller and Tusk who discredit any attempts to challenge their report as “conspiracy theories of PIS pseudospecialists."

These are, of course, strong statements that completely undermine the official version of the Russian and Tusk-led Miller and Lasek reports on Smolensk but such conclusions have been repeatedly presented in the form of theses by scientists cooperating with Antoni Macierewicz.

Now, however, for the first time - and after carefully studying the evidence - the renowned foreign aviation expert acknowledged that explosion brought down the plane - that is Frank Taylor from Great Britain.

This scholar affiliated with the Cranfield University has been involved in aerospace research for years and has worked as a lecturer in aviation and security systems. He was the director of the Flight Safety Center at the College of Aeronautics in Cranfield. In 1998 he was awarded with the prestigious Jerome A. Lederer Award for technical excellence in air crash research by the International Association of Aircraft Investigators.

Three years ago, after reading the Russian MAK report and Polish Miller’s report, Taylor recognized that in the process of explaining the disaster there were "serious shortcomings, including negligence and failure to provide explanations of various key factors that could affect the final conclusions."

He then appealed for a further study of the Smolensk tragedy that would cover all its aspects. According to the British expert, fragments of reports devoted to the behavior of aircraft structures during destruction and the analysis regarding passenger survival were superficial and did not meet international standards. Doubts from a British specialist were also raised by the displacement of some parts of the wreck on the day of the disaster - within the first 24 hours. It is important because according to Frank Taylor, "description and analysis of the wreckage do not seem to explain some of the extraordinary damage to the plane." Today, the Briton analyzed the full evidence in great detail and is now confident that official MAK and Miller’s reports are a lie.

The involvement of Frank Taylor in the work of the Smolensk subcommittee would not be possible without the personal efforts of Antoni Macierewicz, the former head of the Defense Ministry. Those who, after removing him from this position, were happy that he would stop talking about "Smoleńsk" were mistaken. Antoni Macierewicz went away, but other experts, including Frank Taylor, carry on. And in them all hope is placed to finally discover the full truth about Smolensk.

 

Source: G. Wierzcholowski, niezalezna.pl

Photo: Zbyszek Kaczmarek/Gazeta Polska

comments powered by Disqus

 
Smolensk Spectrometer Screen Dumps

Click on the thumbnails below to view screen dumps from the detectors used to examine the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample"

Explosives detected on the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample" - SCREEN DUMP 1 Explosives detected on the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample" - SCREEN DUMP 2
Explosives detected on the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample" - SCREEN DUMP 3 Explosives detected on the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample" - SCREEN DUMP 4
Why did they all fly on the same plane?
Why was the Polish government delegation flying to Smolensk onboard a single aircraft?

Synopsis: January 12, 2013, Toronto, Canada. The wife of the late Deputy-Minister of Culture Tomasz Merta: "What I am about to tell you now, are suspicions - and not even my own - but, rather the [suspicions of the] individuals in the inner-circles of the [Polish] military... I heard a statement that was made - but, I am not taking any responsibility for how credible, or not credible it is. [I heard that] had the generals and journalists' not been re-assigned to different aircraft, it wouldn't have been the Tupolev [Tu-154M], but rather the Casa [transport aircraft] that would have been taken out.

Because the Generals were no longer onboard the Casa, there was no reason for it to get airborne. And for this reason it was the Yak[-40] that flew off to Smolensk. This Casa [transport aircraft] was never examined in any way. It was not subject to any examination. Aside from a single note in the deposition given to the military, no one was interested why this aircraft didn't fly [to Smolensk]. Perhaps, this is someones crazy phantasy, but perhaps it isn't.

Some [Polish] military personnel had suggested, that it [the Casa] had to stay behind at the Okecie military [tarmack], so that the explosives could be removed from it - because they were no longer needed [...] I am only repeating what I was told."

"Disarming" Explosives ...

It is worth for us to retrace the entire process of "disarming" the case of explosive substances at the crash site. It all started with the publication of Cezary Gmyz in "Rzeczpospolita" on October 30, 2012, and information that the detectors, which were used by experts in Smolensk (in late September and October) showed traces of TNT and nitroglycerine.

Independent Experts Confirm Detection of Explosive Substances on Crashed President Jet.

As it turned out, the journalist was also reporting about the indication of Hexogen. The storm broke. The prosecution denied the publication, and ultimately, the editor-in-chief of "Rzeczpospolita," Cezary Gmyz and two other journalists lost their jobs. The entire editorial staff of one of Poland’s most popular weeklies, "Uważam Rze", was also silenced.

Read more here

 

The translation of all materials included on this website into English language, unless otherwise noted, is Copyright ©2008 - 2018 by DoomedSoldiers.com. All Rights Reserved. All materials on this website are subject to the United States and International Copyright Laws and are the property of their respective owners, appearing herewith under The Greater Public Good Doctrine.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.

Word Press WP3.8.1a b1.1