"I am preparing spiritually for the third burial"
Dramatic confession of Gen. Blasik’s widow
Published: May 31, 2017
Gen. Błasik's remains were found in the casket of Gen. Potasiński.
In the interview with TVP1 Ewa Błasik, widow of General Andrzej Błasik, Commander-in-Chief of the Polish Air Force killed in Smolensk said: “Until now I don’t know what I have in the coffin, nor do I know in what conditions is my husband's body. I am spiritually preparing for the third burial.”
The "Fakt" has just reported that in the exhumed coffin of Gen. Wlodzimierz Potasiński there was confusion of bodies. In the coffin of Gen. Ptasiński investigators found his remains as well as remains of four other victims of the Smolensk disaster.
Mrs. Blasik stated that “the remains of my husband were found in the coffin of Gen. Wlodzimierz Potasiński. Our husbands gave their lives in faithful service to Poland, and the Motherland, under the leadership of those mean people, was not able to bury them with dignity.”
Gen. Blasik’s widow also referred to the absurd words of the leader of the Civic Platform Slawomir Neumann, who just suggested publically that the best solution was to bury all the victims of the Smolensk disaster in one common grave.
“Don’t they deserve that their family can stand over their graves, don’t they deserve their own graves and not just collective death pits? I do not understand these words, they hurt me very much,” Mrs. Blasik replied.
Click on the thumbnails below to view screen dumps from the detectors used to examine the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample"
Why did they all fly on the same plane?
Synopsis: January 12, 2013, Toronto, Canada. The wife of the late Deputy-Minister of Culture Tomasz Merta: "What I am about to tell you now, are suspicions - and not even my own - but, rather the [suspicions of the] individuals in the inner-circles of the [Polish] military... I heard a statement that was made - but, I am not taking any responsibility for how credible, or not credible it is. [I heard that] had the generals and journalists' not been re-assigned to different aircraft, it wouldn't have been the Tupolev [Tu-154M], but rather the Casa [transport aircraft] that would have been taken out.
Because the Generals were no longer onboard the Casa, there was no reason for it to get airborne. And for this reason it was the Yak[-40] that flew off to Smolensk. This Casa [transport aircraft] was never examined in any way. It was not subject to any examination. Aside from a single note in the deposition given to the military, no one was interested why this aircraft didn't fly [to Smolensk]. Perhaps, this is someones crazy phantasy, but perhaps it isn't.
Some [Polish] military personnel had suggested, that it [the Casa] had to stay behind at the Okecie military [tarmack], so that the explosives could be removed from it - because they were no longer needed [...] I am only repeating what I was told."
"Disarming" Explosives ...
It is worth for us to retrace the entire process of "disarming" the case of explosive substances at the crash site. It all started with the publication of Cezary Gmyz in "Rzeczpospolita" on October 30, 2012, and information that the detectors, which were used by experts in Smolensk (in late September and October) showed traces of TNT and nitroglycerine.
As it turned out, the journalist was also reporting about the indication of Hexogen. The storm broke. The prosecution denied the publication, and ultimately, the editor-in-chief of "Rzeczpospolita," Cezary Gmyz and two other journalists lost their jobs. The entire editorial staff of one of Poland’s most popular weeklies, "Uważam Rze", was also silenced.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.