Header
Smolensk Crash News Digest
Independent News, Research, Scientific Analysis, and Commentary on the Smolensk Crash and its Implications. Flag of the United States of America
"The dismantling of the Polish State has just ended. Now people will start to disappear." Dr. Janusz Kurtyka Contact | About
  • Smolensk Crash DisinformationNo one saw anything, no one heard anything, no one filmed anything ...
  • Russian Image Management by Euguene PoteatRetired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligence Officer Euguene Poteat speaks out
  • TNT and other explosives detected on the wreckage of Polish presidential planeC4, TNT, RDX, HMX (octogen), p-MNT and Nitroglycerine detected ...
  • Smolensk Crash related deaths"The Serial Suicider" Strikes Again. Key witness dead!
  • Countdown to the crash of Flight PLF101Countdown to the crash of Polish Governement Tupolev TU-154M flight PLF101.
  • Smolensk Widow Beata Gosiewska exposes the Smolnesk Crash LieSmolensk Crash Widow exposes the "Smolensk Lie"
  • The List of 96 Victims of Polish Air Crash In Smolensk, Russia, on April 10, 2010.The list of 96 victims
  • 9 Questions for Professor Binienda.Is the U.S. scientific community interested in the Smolensk crash?
  • The destruction of the plane was initiated while it was still airborne, approaching landing.The destruction of the plane was initiated while it was still airborne, approaching landing.
  • Lech Kaczynski's Security Was Purposefully CompromisedPolish president's security was purposefully compromised!
  • Slide 11 Title Goes HereThe main causes of the Polish Tu-154M crash were two explosions onboard.
  • Facts presented in this report demonstrate a clear and convincing evidence of obstruction of justice in the one-sided and superficial investigation that violates basic norms of any airplane crash investigation, elementary standards of due process of law, and rights of the families of the victims.Was the official investigation an obstruction of justice?
Polish air crash disinformation. Russian Image Management by Retired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligene Officer, Eugene Poteat, LL.D Traces of explosives detected on remains of Polish president's plane. Serial Suicider on the loose. The crash of Flight PLF101 Timeline. Polish air crash lie exposed. Victims of Polish air crash. 9 Questions for the lead scientist in the independent Smolensk crash investigation. Mechanical and structural aspects of 2010 crash of Polish Government Tupolev TU-154M in Smolensk, Russka. Polish president's security was intentionally compromised. Scientific analysis of Smolensk crash points to the invalidity of the official findings. 2014 independent Smolensk Crash Raport: What do we know about Smolensk crash today.

Some Mechanical and Structural Aspects of the Smolensk Crash
By Dr. Gregory Szuladzinski, Ph.D., MSME
SCND2014GS

7. Separation of the Tail Section of Fuselage

Figure 23 is one of the pictures available that shows the tail segment at the place of fall. Construction drawings show that the bulkhead, around which there has been a rupture and separation from the rest of the hull, was strong, well built and had a concave (as viewed from the front of the plane) metal wall.

If the fuselage fell at this spot in one piece and if the rear part hit the ground, the bulkhead would buckle, or even crack, but it would remain as a part of this section of the hull. To achieve this condition, the perimeter would have to ovalize. However, the profile, partly visible in the photographic documentation of the scene, is round, at least to the naked eye. The hull does not look distorted by a strong external impact. But the bulkhead itself appears damaged. Only high internal pressure can explain this. This state fits the hypothesis of an explosion.

Apart from the above it should be noted that the left part of the beam connecting the two motors in Figure 23 is bent inside the tail section of the hull. This may be associated with hitting the ground, although it seems that in this case it should be bent in the opposite direction.

Again, we face the question of fuel vapor explosion versus HE material. There is a difference between the nature of the shock wave in both cases. The latter gives a thinner, but more intense wave. When reflected from obstacles such as wall, suddenly the pressure increases near the wall. This causes the effect of the axial force to be combined with the local bending (axisymmetric) around the entire circumference of the affected area. (A simple example is the well-known configuration of a cylindrical pressure vessel wall near the closed end.) The formation of this secondary bending made it easier for the wall to break and the tail part to separate.

In the case of fuel exploding, the wave is less intense, but wider and therefore not so much amplified by reflection. The secondary bending is weaker and the axial force plays a relatively larger role. In this situation, a better place for a separation may be the section through the last window in the hull. Although the cross-sectional area loss caused by the windows is not great, the windows induce stress concentrations, the effect of which is greater under dynamic loads than under the application static pressure.

Could the separation of the tail section occur after the fall? Unfortunately, there is no discernible trace of the explosion on the ground.

 

Parts of this Report
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

 
Explosives Found on the Wreckage

Conclusive evidence of explosives detection emerges! Antoni Macierewicz Press Conference, July 19, 2013. Examples of Spectrometer readouts released to the public.

Conclusive evidence of explosives detection emerges! Antoni Macierewicz Press Conference, July 19, 2013. Examples of Spectrometer readouts released to the public.

Read more here

 

The translation of all materials included on this website into English language, unless otherwise noted, is Copyright ©2008 - 2016 by DoomedSoldiers.com. All Rights Reserved. All materials on this website are subject to the United States and International Copyright Laws and are the property of their respective owners, appearing herewith under The Greater Public Good Doctrine.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.

Word Press WP3.8.1a b1.1