Header
Smolensk Crash News Digest
Independent News, Research, Scientific Analysis, and Commentary on the Smolensk Crash and its Implications. Flag of the United States of America
"The dismantling of the Polish State has just ended. Now people will start to disappear." Dr. Janusz Kurtyka Contact | About
  • Smolensk Crash DisinformationNo one saw anything, no one heard anything, no one filmed anything ...
  • Russian Image Management by Euguene PoteatRetired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligence Officer Euguene Poteat speaks out
  • TNT and other explosives detected on the wreckage of Polish presidential planeC4, TNT, RDX, HMX (octogen), p-MNT and Nitroglycerine detected ...
  • Smolensk Crash related deaths"The Serial Suicider" Strikes Again. Key witness dead!
  • Countdown to the crash of Flight PLF101Countdown to the crash of Polish Governement Tupolev TU-154M flight PLF101.
  • Smolensk Widow Beata Gosiewska exposes the Smolnesk Crash LieSmolensk Crash Widow exposes the "Smolensk Lie"
  • The List of 96 Victims of Polish Air Crash In Smolensk, Russia, on April 10, 2010.The list of 96 victims
  • 9 Questions for Professor Binienda.Is the U.S. scientific community interested in the Smolensk crash?
  • The destruction of the plane was initiated while it was still airborne, approaching landing.The destruction of the plane was initiated while it was still airborne, approaching landing.
  • Lech Kaczynski's Security Was Purposefully CompromisedPolish president's security was purposefully compromised!
  • Slide 11 Title Goes HereThe main causes of the Polish Tu-154M crash were two explosions onboard.
  • Facts presented in this report demonstrate a clear and convincing evidence of obstruction of justice in the one-sided and superficial investigation that violates basic norms of any airplane crash investigation, elementary standards of due process of law, and rights of the families of the victims.Was the official investigation an obstruction of justice?
Polish air crash disinformation. Russian Image Management by Retired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligene Officer, Eugene Poteat, LL.D Traces of explosives detected on remains of Polish president's plane. Serial Suicider on the loose. The crash of Flight PLF101 Timeline. Polish air crash lie exposed. Victims of Polish air crash. 9 Questions for the lead scientist in the independent Smolensk crash investigation. Mechanical and structural aspects of 2010 crash of Polish Government Tupolev TU-154M in Smolensk, Russka. Polish president's security was intentionally compromised. Scientific analysis of Smolensk crash points to the invalidity of the official findings. 2014 independent Smolensk Crash Raport: What do we know about Smolensk crash today.

2011 Independent Crash Investigation Update

IAC Investigation Conducted in Violation of International Agreements
ICIU2011

Three days after the Smolensk Crash, the Republic of Poland and the Russian Federation entered into an agreement to proceed with the investigation of the Smolensk Crash in accordance with the Chicago Convention. The parties agreed to proceed in accordance with Annex 13 to the Chicago Convention that governs aircraft accident and incident investigation (“Annex 13”). Accordingly, the Russian Federation as the State of Occurrence was in charge of conducting the investigation while the Republic of Poland designated its Accredited Representative to participate in the investigation in accordance with Article 5.18 of the Chicago Convention.

In the course of the investigation, the Polish Government acting through its Accredited Representative filed numerous motions and requests with respect to the investigation in accordance with Article 5.25 of Annex 13. Specifically, the Polish side submitted 222 inquiries for information to the Russian Federation. Only 34 inquiries were answered. The Russian Federation ignored or refused to acknowledge 169 inquiries, and partially answered 19 inquires. As a result of this lack of cooperation from the Russian side, the Polish Accredited Representative and his advisers were unable to fulfil their responsibilities under Annex 13.

Among the motions ignored or refused was a request for information regarding the assessment of the minimum airdrome conditions at the Smolensk airport, a request for video recordings of radar display readings by the Chief Air Traffic Controller on April 10, 2010 with respect to landing approach of the following flights: Il-76, Yak-40, Tu-154M, a request for photographic documentation from the crash scene, a request for data of the fly-around performed soon after the crash, and requests for inspection of communication and navigation aids. The Polish side did not receive any technical expertise of the wreckage debris or any data of two failed attempts of Il-76 landings prior to the crash of PLF 101. A motion to authorize the Polish Accredited Representative and two specialists to take part in the fly-around procedure was denied. A protest against this refusal was ignored as well as the protest against the refusal of the inspection of the RSP-6M2 radar system in Smolensk.

The Republic of Poland as the State having suffered fatalities of its President, First Lady, nine generals and the top leadership, was denied access to the relevant factual information with respect to rescue, first aid, survival data and autopsy examination in direct violation of Article 5.27 of Annex 13. As a result, the Polish side was unable to provide its response to vitally important parts of the IAC Final Report, including sections 1.13 Medical Tracing Examination, 1.14 Data on the Survival of Passengers, Crew Members and Others of the Aircraft Incident, and 3.1. Findings. In particular, the Russian side failed to provide to the Polish side the following information:

1) documentation of forensic examination of the crew of the aircraft, together with the results of toxicological and identification examination;

2) report of the inspection of the site; the Polish side has no knowledge as to where the specific inspection areas were located and how they were marked.5

The IAC Final Report provides no information about the rescue actions taken at the scene of the accident. The Polish side has not received any transcripts of communication or situational plans, reports of participants of the rescue and fire fighting teams, photographic documentation, including film footage, which is essential for proper assessment of the security level of Smolensk “Severny” airfield regarding fire fighting services, rescue operations and medical security. The Polish side was not given access to the protocol of surveillance of the location of the occurrence thus was not able to reply to Finding 3.1.67.

Similarly, the Polish side was not in the position to respond to Finding 3.1.68 of the IAC Final Report that the Commander-in-Chief of the Polish Air Forces General Andrzej Blasik was present in the cockpit at the time of the impact with the ground. Furthermore, the Polish Side was not in the position to respond to the statement that the coronary examination revealed 0.6‰ of ethanol in the blood of the Commander-in-Chief of the Polish Air Forces. Results of testing the concentration of alcohol in the blood of the Polish Air Force Commander Blasik cannot be independently verified because of the unavailability of the source documentation. No authorized toxicological data and information as to when and how the material was secured for analysis was provided to the Polish side.6

All requests of the Polish side regarding the information with respect to smoke present in the vicinity of the airport on the day of the crash were denied. Regular citations made by the meteorologist from 4.00 a.m. UTC indicated the presence of smoke. The Polish inquiry as to the source of fires and smoke in the area surrounding the airport at the time of the crash and its adverse effect on atmospheric conditions was ignored as well. No information about the rescue and extinguishing of fires was provided. No reports regarding testing for traces of explosive materials were provided. Testing for non-conventional explosions were not made.

Only 19 full post-mortem reports were provided; the remaining 77 are either grossly inaccurate or not provided. Medical and pathological reports for some victims contain descriptions of organs that had been surgically removed from the victims long before the crash.7

The list of 169 Polish requests unanswered by the IAC as of December 19, 2010 remained unchanged after the official presentation of the IAC Final Report on January 13, 2010. In August 2011, the Polish side officially confirmed that no additional information regarding the outstanding 169 Polish inquires has been received from the Russian Federation.8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Footnotes:

5 The Polish Response in English, p. 60.

6 The Polish Response in English, p. 143. In January 2011 IAC published on its website a document nr. 37 dated April 11, 2010 that purportedly represents testing of Gen. Błasik's blood. Medical experts point out that a natural alcohol is produced in the body within 24 hours from death and can reach even 1 percent. Therefore other tests are required to verify such findings. However the Russian side did not produce any other tests and did not present supporting documents.

See also:

"Ekspert: Błasik niekoniecznie pił" here: http://bit.ly/1ml9vXh and http://bit.ly/1mlaZRo and http://bit.ly/1mlb3Ao

7 See also:

"Rosja nie przekazała pełnej dokumentacji dot. sekcji zwłok ofiar katastrofy" http://bit.ly/1mlb6fK and

"Parulski: Kompletne materiały z sekcji tylko 18 ofiar" here: http://bit.ly/1mlbb2U

8 Official Statement of the Polish Ministry of Internal Affairs of August 2011.

 
"Russian Image Management"

The trip to Smolensk was expected to highlight Russia finally admitting culpability in the massacre, after long having blamed it on the Germans, an atrocity they had tried to conceal for over 70 years.

Eugene Poteat, retired CIA Senior Scientific Intelligence Officer.

As for the reception committee, it had different ideas. Putin wasn’t looking forward to such an occasion. Into this poisonous reception brew was President Kaczynski’s well-known public criticism of Moscow and Putin, a habit that has ended the lives of others within Russia – and abroad. A few discouraging Russian requirements – that Kaczynski could not attend in any official capacity – did not halt the Poles. Kaczynski would go anyway on non-official, “personal” business. To Russians, such a distinction would be meaningless, not lessening the possible international excoriation of such an event. A problem ripe for a modern, Russian solution: a tragic, ‘natural’ accident.

Read more here

 

The translation of all materials included on this website into English language, unless otherwise noted, is Copyright ©2008 - 2016 by DoomedSoldiers.com. All Rights Reserved. All materials on this website are subject to the United States and International Copyright Laws and are the property of their respective owners, appearing herewith under The Greater Public Good Doctrine.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.

Word Press WP3.8.1a b1.1